Legal Opinion

Burton v. Rohrbeck

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1883PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeal by. defendant from a judgment of the municipal court of St. Paul.

1Opinion of the CourtDickinson, J.

This proceeding was commenced in the municipal court of the city of St. Paul, under'Gen. St. 1878, c. 84, § 11, relating to forcible entries and unlawful detainers. Judgment was rendered awarding to plaintiffs possession of the premises in question, and defendant appeals. The premises were owned by one Crawford, who had demised the same to one Eichelberger, for a term to expire on the 31st day of July, 1882. Defendant became a sublessee under Eichelberger, occupied the premises during the term of such lease, and was holding over after its expiration when this proceeding was instituted. Before…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ball v. ChadwickIllinois Supreme Court · 1867
  2. Barton v. LearnedSupreme Court of Vermont · 1854

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. First Minneapolis Trust Co. v. Lancaster Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1931
  2. Lanzo v. F & D MOTOR WORKSCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API