State v. Jackson
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CONNOLLY, Judge.
On appeal from his conviction of attempted first-degree aggravated robbery, appellant argues that the district court’s admission of a firearm-trace report through the testimony of a police officer who did not perform the trace or prepare the report, violated his Sixth Amendment right to confrontation under Crawford v. Washington, 541 U.S. 36, 124 S.Ct. 1354, 158 L.Ed.2d 177 (2004). Because the firearmtrace report was not prepared for purposes of litigation, and is therefore not testimonial in nature under Crawford, we affirm.
FACTS
Appellant A.C. Jackson challenges his…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Crawford v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- State v. GrillerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1998
- State v. CaulfieldSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2006
- State v. StrommenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2002
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Minnesota v. Rosalio Martinez, Jr.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2024