Legal Opinion
Stengel v. City of Hartford
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 29, 1987No. Civ. H-85-733 (PCD)PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION TO DISMISS
DORSEY, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss all but the fourth count of plaintiffs’ complaint. 1 The facts of this case were fully set forth in the Ruling on Motion to Dismiss filed on May 13, 1986, and need not be repeated here.
Count One
Count One alleges a cause of action against Officer Nunes and the City of Hartford claiming that defendants’ conduct deprived plaintiffs’ decedent of his first, fourth, fifth and fourteenth amendment rights. The action against the City is predicated on the allegations that it has a “custom or implicit policy of condoning,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Tennessee v. GarnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Donald L. Hays, Jr., and Michael C. Potter, Cross-Appellants v. Jefferson County, Kentucky, Wilbur Bilyeu and Russell McDaniel Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1982
- Thomas Turpin v. Joseph MailetCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Carson v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Singleton v. City of NewburghDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1998
- Birdsall v. City of HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2003
- Neil v. EspinozaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987
- Neil v. EspinozaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1987