Legal Opinion

Industrial Commissioner v. Stambler

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1949PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtBeldock, J.

The Industrial Commissioner of the State of New York moves for a turnover order under subdivision 2 of section 794 of the Civil Practice Act directing Rite-Glo Inc., the third party in supplementary proceedings, to pay over to him $906.18 from a fund of $3,402.43 held on the third party’s behalf by its attorney and which fund belongs to the judgment debtor, one Stambler.

The fund has come into possession of the attorney for the third party under the following circumstances: In September of 1948, Stambler recovered a judgment in this court against Rite-Glo in the sum of $6,643.64. Prior to…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. MacKenzie v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
  2. United States v. Record Pub. Co.District Court, N.D. California · 1945
  3. Manufacturers Trust Co. v. SobelCity of New York Municipal Court · 1940
  4. Franklin Auto Supply Co. v. Bellerose Motors, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1948
  5. In re BoulevardNew York Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API