In re Boulevard
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.
This court, by memorandum decision dated February 6, 3939, passed upon various claims against the award contained in the final decree for Damage Parcel 235, determined the priorities of various liens, and decided: “ Subject to payment or proof of satisfaction of the United States Government’s claim, the award shall be paid as follows: 1. Charles H. Jones et al., *1019judgment creditors. 2. Lien of the attorney for services rendered in the proceeding. 3. Claim of Mr. Kalenderian for services rendered. 4. Bank of Farmingdale, assignee. 5. Bank of Hicks-ville, assignee. Settle order on notice.”
The…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Mtr. of City of New York (Usa Coblentz)New York Court of Appeals · 1959
- National Surety Corp. v. SharpeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Industrial Commissioner v. StamblerNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Mtr. of City of New York (Usa Coblentz)New York Court of Appeals · 1959