Legal Opinion

Langdon v. Cambridge Mutual Fire Insurance Co.

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided March 20, 1972PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUMPHREYS, Justice.

In January 1966, Mrs. Langdon insured her house for $10,000.00, and its contents for $4,000.00, with Cambridge Mutual, with a standard loss payable clause in favor of her mortgagee, Leader Federal Savings and Loan Association. Later, in November 1966, Mrs. Langdon borrowed $844.00 from Pacific Finance Loans, and as a part of the loan, she was required to purchase insurance with Olympic Insurance Company, insuring her household contents from loss by fire for the amount of the loan, with a loss clause providing that the loss if any, “shall be payable to: Pacific…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Loftis v. Stuyvesant Insurance Co.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1965
  2. Smith v. Northern InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1931
  3. De Witt v. . Agricultural Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Kirkland v. Ohio Casualty InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API