Legal Opinion

Union Oil Company of California, Cross-Appellee v. Darrel D. Heinsohn, an Individual, and Kathy Heinsohn, an Individual, Third-Party-Plaintiffs v. Exxon Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Third-Party Cross-Appellee

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided December 15, 1994No. 92-6211PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

43 F.3d 500

UNION OIL COMPANY OF CALIFORNIA, Plaintiff, Appellant, Cross-Appellee,

v.

Darrel D. HEINSOHN, an individual, and Kathy Heinsohn, an

individual, Defendants, Third-Party-Plaintiffs,

Appellees, Cross-Appellants,

v.

EXXON CORPORATION, a New Jersey corporation, Third-Party

Defendant, Appellant, Cross-Appellee.

Nos. 92-6211, 92-6217, and 92-6240.

United States Court of Appeals,

Tenth Circuit.

Dec. 15, 1994.

L. Mark Walker (Val R. Miller, with him on the briefs), of Crowe & Dunlevy, P.C., Oklahoma City, OK, for appellant, cross-appellee Exxon Corp.

Gregory A. McKenzie, of McKenzie, Moffett & Sykora,…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Salve Regina College v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Dennis Skinner, and Cross-Appellant v. Total Petroleum, Inc., a Michigan Corporation, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  3. City of Ardmore v. OrrSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  4. Davis Oil Co. v. CloudSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1989
  5. Briscoe v. Harper Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lynn and Deyon Boughton v. Cotter CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
  2. City of Tulsa v. Tyson Foods, Inc.District Court, N.D. Oklahoma · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API