Legal Opinion

Primm v. City of Reno

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided January 20, 1953No. 3722PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Merrill, J.:

This is a proceeding in mandamus by which petitioner seeks to compel respondents to issue to him licenses to conduct gambling and dispense liquors on premises owned by him in the city of Reno. Applications for such licenses were duly made by petitioner and were denied by the Reno city council on October 22, 1951. Petitioner then sought a writ of mandate from the district court of Washoe county which was denied June 30, 1952. The petition in this matter was filed August 8, 1952.

■Petitioner acquired the premises in question in 1946 for the purpose of establishing…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Spiros v. PayneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1945
  2. Marshall v. HolbrookMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1931
  3. State Ex Rel. Grimes v. Board of CommissionersNevada Supreme Court · 1931
  4. People v. ElkinMount Vernon City Court · 1948
  5. Marchesi v. Selectmen of WinchesterMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1942

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Nevada Tax Commission v. HicksNevada Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Hope for Families & Community Service, Inc. v. WarrenDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2010
  3. State Ex Rel. Capps v. BrunsMissouri Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. Guy v. Town of TempleSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
  5. Fairfax MK, Inc. v. City of ClarkstonSupreme Court of Georgia · 2001

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API