Legal Opinion
Deutsche Post Global Mail, Ltd. v. Conrad
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 14, 2003No. CIV. JFM-03-863PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MOTZ, District Judge.
Plaintiff Deutsche Post Global Mail, Ltd. (“DPGM”) has brought this suit against Defendants Gerard Conrad and Guy Gem-mill, who are former employees of DPGM, and Postal Logistics International (“PLI”), a corporation formed by Conrad and Gem-mill DPGM claims that Conrad and Gem-mill violated restrictive covenants contained in their employment contracts by forming PLI after their departure from DPGM. 1
At the same time that it filed the complaint, DPGM moved for a preliminary injunction to bar Defendants from soliciting or diverting any customers that were customers…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Thompson Everett, Inc. v. National Cable Advertising, L.P. Cable Networks, Inc. Cable Media CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1995
- Fowler v. Printers II, Inc.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1991
- Holloway v. Faw, Casson & Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1990
- Ruhl v. F. A. Bartlett Tree Expert Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Ameritox, Ltd. v. SavelichDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2015
- Yehuda Steiner v. American Friends of Lubavitch (Chaabad)District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2018
- Jones v. Genus Credit Management Corp.District Court, D. Maryland · 2005