Legal Opinion

Matter of Goerig

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1991No. 18709PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SILAK, Judge.

James Goerig was arrested for driving under the influence of alcohol, I.C. § 18-8004. He agreed to take a breathalyzer test on the condition that the police administering the test remove his handcuffs. The police refused and Goerig did not take the test. The issue presented on appeal is whether Goerig’s conditional consent to take a test to determine blood alcohol content should be considered to be a refusal for the purpose of determining whether his driver’s license should be revoked under I.C. § 18-8002(4). We limit our holding to the particular facts of this case and conclude…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. ZielkeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. State v. WooleryIdaho Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Illinois v. BatchelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Staggie v. Idaho Falls Consolidated Hospitals, Inc.Idaho Court of Appeals · 1986
  5. Matter of GriffithsIdaho Supreme Court · 1987

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ausman v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1993
  2. State v. NickersonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Fugere v. State, Taxation & Revenue Department, Motor Vehicle DivisionNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
  4. Pittsley v. HouserIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. State v. HarmonIdaho Court of Appeals · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API