Legal Opinion

United States v. Manufacturers Cas. Ins.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided June 16, 1953PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DIMOCK, District Judge.

The United States sues the Manufacturers Casualty Insurance Company to recover $500, the full amount of a bond posted by defendant with the United States on behalf of an alien, Abram Brull, a non quota immigrant student who entered under section 4(e) of the Immigration Act of May 26, 1924, as amended, formerly 8 U.S.C. § 204(e) now covered by 8 U.S.C. §§ 1101(a) (15) (F), 1184. The bond was conditioned upon the departure of Brull from the United States on or before June 27, 1948. Brull did not depart on or before that date. Defendant moves for summary judgment…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Illinois Surety Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
  2. Quaile & Co. v. William Kelly Milling Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1931
  3. Bedford v. J. Henry Miller, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1914

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Manufacturers Casualty InsuranceDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1957
  2. In re ZahariaDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API