Legal Opinion

Tisdale v. Hartley

District Court, W.D. New York

Decided March 2, 2020No. 6:18-cv-06119Unknown

1Opinion

TATES DIST; EP ee > □□ MAR 02 2020 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT UM WESTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK Wetec LOEWENGUTH oF ERN DISTRICT OF TYNELL TISDALE, DECISION AND ORDER Plaintiff, V. 6:18-cv-06119 EAW MR. RYAN HARTLEY, Police Officer, MR. ROBERT OSIPORITCH, Police Officer, Defendants. INTRODUCTION Pro se plaintiff Tynell Tisdale (“Plaintiff”) asserts claims pursuant to

42 U.S.C. § 1983

against defendants Rochester Police Department Officers Ryan Hartley (“Officer Hartley”) and Robert Osiporitch (“Officer Osiporitch”) (collectively “Defendants”) related to a strip search on February 26, 2011.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
Heck v. HumphreySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
Walker v. SchultCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2013
DiFolco v. MSNBC Cable L.L.C.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2010

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.