Legal Opinion

Wood v. General Accident Ins. Co. of Philadelphia

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Pennsylvania

Decided November 14, 1907No. 6PublishedCited by 3 opinions

At Law. On motion for judgment non obstante yeredicto.

1Opinion of the Court

BUFFINGTON, Circuit Judge.

The defendant insurance company in this case issued, on November 23, 190ñ, a general accident policy to Douglas C. Wood, the plaintiff. The beneficiary named in the policy was Ira II. Wood, a brother of the insured. The policy provided:

“In, case a beneficiary other than the insured or Ms legal representatives is specifically named in the schedule of warranties indorsed on this policy, then and not otherwise this policy shall also, in consideration of the premium, insure the person named as beneficiary in the said schedule as follows: Against any one of the following…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ripley v. Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Poncino v. Sierra Nevada Life & Casualty Co.California Court of Appeal · 1930
  2. Bogart v. Standard Life & Accident Ins.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Washington · 1911
  3. Continental Life Ins. Co. v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API