Legal Opinion
Maynard v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided April 5, 2010No. Civil Action 09-131 (EGS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
EMMET G. SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiff Jackeline Maynard seeks review of an administrative decision denying her request for reimbursement of the costs of her minor son’s attendance at the Accotink Academy (“Accotink”), a private school located in Springfield, Virginia. Plaintiff argues that she is entitled to tuition reimbursement because the District of Columbia Public Schools (“DCPS”) denied her son a free appropriate public edu cation (“FAPE”) as required by the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (“IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400 et seq., by failing to develop an…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Honig v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- School Committee of the Town of Burlington v. Department of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Leggett v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014
- Dallas Independent School District v. Woody ex rel. K.W.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2016
- MADISON BOARD OF EDUCATION v. S.V.District Court, D. New Jersey · 2020
- Richards v. Hudson School DistrictDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2013