Legal Opinion
Leggett v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 23, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-0084PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
REGGIE B. WALTON, United States District Judge
Plaintiffs Jane Leggett, in her own right and on behalf of her daughter, K.E., bring claims under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C. §§ 1400-1491 (2012), alleging that the District of Columbia failed to: (1) provide K.E. with a free appropriate public education, (2) order an appropriate program and placement, and (3) render a proper decision during the administrative proceedings. Complaint for Declaratory and Injunctive Relief (“Compl.”) ¶¶ 94-100. Currently before the Court are the parties’…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Board of Education of the Hendrick Hudson Central School District v. Rowley Ex Rel. RowleySupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Florence County School District Four v. Carter Ex Rel. CarterSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Reid Ex Rel. Reid v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2005
- S.H., Individually and on Behalf of I.H. v. State-Operated School District of the City of NewarkCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Alexander Kerkam v. Floretta McKenzie Superintendent, D.C. Public SchoolsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1989
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Leggett v. District of ColumbiaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Pinto v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2014