Legal Opinion

Bent v. Lipscomb

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided November 16, 1898PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Circuit Court, Randolph County. Action by James A. Bent against Lipscomb & Lipscomb. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.

1Opinion of the Court

BRANNON, President:

Action by Bent against Lipscomb & Lipscomb before a justice, appealed to the circuit court, where, upon demurrer to evidence, judgment was given for defendants. One Kessell, in an action against Hinkle, recovered a judgment. *184Bent was one of his attorneys. The common law gave him a lien on that judgment for his compensation as attorney, and he had a writing from Kessell giving him a right to “retain, out of any recovery of money had by a verdict and judgment, one-fourth value of such verdict and judgment in said suit in money, as compensation for his (said Bent’s) services…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Fowler v. Lewis's Adm'rWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1892
  2. Bentley v. Standard Fire InsuranceWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Renick v. LudingtonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kanawha Banking & Trust Co. v. GilbertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Cetenko v. United California BankCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. State ex rel. Showen v. O'BrienWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Estate of Button v. AndersonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  5. Capehart v. ChurchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API