Legal Opinion

Hudelson v. Armstrong

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1879PublishedCited by 6 opinions

From the Gibson Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtHowk, C. J.

— In this action, the appellants sued the appellees upon a promissory note, of which the following is a copy:

“ $3,399.08. Marsh Creek, Nov. 11th, 1873..
“ Three years after date, we promise to pay to the order of W. H. & J. F. Hudelson, administrators of the estate of Samuel Hudelson, deceased, the sum of thirty-three hundred and ninety-nine dollars, with five per cent, •attorney’s fees if suit be instituted on this note, value received, without any relief whatever from valuation or *100appraisement laws, with interest at the rate of ten per cent, per annum from date. The drawers and endorsers…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. United States v. PriceSupreme Court of the United States · 1850
  2. Getty v. . BinsseNew York Court of Appeals · 1872
  3. Wood v. . FiskNew York Court of Appeals · 1875
  4. Patterson v. CrawfordIndiana Supreme Court · 1859
  5. Belton v. SmithIndiana Supreme Court · 1873

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Opp v. TenEyckIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Nadstanek v. TraskOregon Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Greathouse v. KlineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  4. Redman v. MarvilIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
  5. Eldred v. First National BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1880

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API