Legal Opinion · Dissent

Lebanon Valley Farmers Bank v. Commonwealth

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 27, 2013Published

1DissentJustice Saylor

I respectfully dissent, as I would find that the Bank Shares Tax’s combination provision violates tax uniformity insofar as it has been interpreted to exclude out-of-state banks. I would not, however, affirm the Commonwealth Court’s decision, as I believe that its attempt to resolve the infirmity also leads to a non-uniform taxing scheme. Rather, I would construe the combination provision to subsume mergers with in-state or out-of-state banks equally. My reasoning follows.

Under Pennsylvania’s Uniformity Clause, see Pa. Const. art. VIII, § 1 (requiring all taxes to be uniform upon the same…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Deitch Co. v. Board of Property AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  2. Commonwealth v. TilghmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. McKnight Shopping Center, Inc. v. Board of Property AssessmentSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Clifton v. Allegheny CountySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  5. Leonard v. ThornburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API