Legal Opinion

BISTRIAN v. WARDEN TROY LEVI

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided January 30, 2023No. 2:08-cv-03010Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA PETER BISTRIAN, Plaintiff, v. CIVIL ACTION NO. 08-3010 WARDEN TROY LEVI, FDC PHILADELPHIA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Defendant United States seeks reconsideration of the Court’s order imposing sanctions for failing to timely disclose evidence relevant to Plaintiff Peter Bistrian’s Bivens claims, arguing that the Court lacked the necessary context to determine whether Defendant’s conduct warranted sanctions. As explained below, Defendant’s motion comprises rehashed arguments that have previously been…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States Ex Rel. Touhy v. RagenSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  3. United States Ex Rel. Schumann v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
  4. Continental Casualty Co. v. Diversified Industries, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Blue Mountain Mushroom Co., Inc. v. MONTERY MUSHROOM, INC.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2002

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API