Legal Opinion
United States v. Storage Spaces Designated Nos. "8" & "49"
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 3, 1985No. Nos. 85-1085, 85-1086PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHOY, Senior Circuit Judge:
Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) Inspector Anderson presented to a magistrate two identical 16-page affidavits relating information he had derived from his investigation of appellants Balarama’s Enterprises, Inc. (“Balarama’s”) and NESCCO, INC. (“NESCCO”). The magistrate issued two search warrants, one for Balarama’s’ main office at 650 South Bridge St., Visalia, California, and the other for NESCCO’s leased storage spaces, numbers 8 and 49, at 727 East Douglas, Visalia, California.
Both warrants designated the same fifteen items to be seized, including fourteen…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Stoner v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Andresen v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- United States v. John Spilotro Herbert Blitzstein and Joseph C. BlaskoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States v. Alexander Robert Holzman, United States of America v. James WalshCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
- Allergan, Inc. v. Athena Cosmetics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Kasz Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.