Legal Opinion
United States v. Alexander Robert Holzman, United States of America v. James Walsh
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided April 7, 1989No. 85-1365, 86-1000PublishedCited by 80 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BRUNETTI, Circuit Judge:
This is the consolidated appeal of Alexander Holzman and James Walsh who were convicted of passing, and conspiring to pass, forged United States Savings Bonds. Appellants contest the district court’s denial of their joint motion to suppress evidence obtained during the search incident to their arrest, and the subsequent search of their hotel rooms.
I
BACKGROUND
On the evening of December 19, 1983, Arizona Police Detective Hill was working off-duty as a security employee for a department store in Scottsdale, Arizona. He saw two men, Holzman and Walsh, enter the store…
2Cases cited85 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by80 opinions
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. StensonWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- United States v. $191,910.00 in U.S. Currency, Bruce R. Morgan, Claimant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- United States v. Hector Martin RamosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- United States v. Russell R. George, AKA Rusty, and Pamela A. Johnson-Sherman, Francis R. LajoiceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1992
75 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.