Legal Opinion

In Re Goldfarb

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided December 15, 1949PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] Plaintiff seeks a judgment granting her a right of visitation. She is the maternal grandmother of the infant. Relief was granted to her pendente lite by order dated November 19, 1948. Contempt proceedings were later instituted against the father of the child, charging violation of the temporary order. Both matters have been fully heard and are herein determined.

I regret that I must conclude that plaintiff cannot be granted the relief which she seeks on her…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Sisson v. SissonNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
  2. In Re AlsdorfNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
  3. Starr v. GormanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
  4. Ewald v. OrtynskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909
  5. People ex rel. Marks v. GrenierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1937

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In Re FlaschNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
  2. In re WhitakerOhio Supreme Court · 1988
  3. In Re Application of LawrenceNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975
  4. In Re Adoption of Child by M.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1976
  5. Egner v. EgnerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1975

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API