Ewald v. Ortynsky
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Ou appeal from a decree of the court of chancery advised by Vice-Chancellor Learning.
1Opinion of the Court
*292The opinion of the court was delivered by
Swayze, J.
The appellant is the defendant in the case. It demurred to the bill of complaint for numerous causes. Four of these which went to the whole of the bill were held good by the vice-chancellor, and accordingly an order was made on the motion of the appellant allowing the demurrer. Later the appellant applied for a re-argument and obtained an order allowing the demurrer on the four grounds and overruling it on the others, and then appealed upon the ground that the demurrer should have been allowed on all the grounds specified.
Only those who are…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hooper v. . BeecherNew York Court of Appeals · 1888
3Cited by8 opinions
- In Re AlsdorfNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1948
- In Re GoldfarbNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- In re PetagnoNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1946
- Brown v. ParsonsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1945
- In re application for possession of JudgeNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1920
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.