Legal Opinion

Cuadrado v. New York City Transit Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided August 11, 2009PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), entered January 22, 2008, which granted defendants’ motion to set aside a jury verdict rendered in favor of plaintiff, reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the verdict reinstated.

Through her own testimony and that of a disinterested witness, plaintiff produced sufficient objective evidence to establish that the bus from which she fell made a movement that was “unusual and violent,” that is, something more than the jolting and jerking incidental to the operation of a city bus (see *435Urquhart v New York City Tr.…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Urquhart v. New York City Transit AuthorityNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Peguero v. 601 Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Harris v. ArmstrongNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  4. Rountree v. Manhattan & Bronx Surface Transit Operating AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
  5. Perales v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Fay v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
  2. Waring v. Sunrise Yonkers SL, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
  3. Nieves v. Riverbay Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
  4. Godfrey v. G.E. Capital Auto Lease, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
  5. Godfrey v. GE CAPITAL AUTO LEASE, INC.New York Court of Appeals · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API