Legal Opinion

In re the Marriage of Bounds

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 8, 2003No. 15-99-08722; A111333PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWollheim, J.

Husband appeals from a judgment dissolving his 20-year marriage. He assigns error to, among other things, the trial court’s award of spousal support to wife. He argues that the trial court erred by failing to take into account the investment income wife would earn from the property division and by attributing to him an annual income of $50,000. On de novo review, ORS 19.415(3) and ORS 107.405, we affirm.

Husband and wife were married in 1978. At the time of trial, husband was 49 years old and wife was 46 years old. The parties had three children, two of whom are still minors. Wife was awarded…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. HitzOregon Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Matter of Marriage of PowellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
  3. In re the Marriage of SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. In re the Marriage of BattCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Glanden v. QuirkSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
  2. In re the Marriage of CullenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2008
  3. In Re the Marriage of AbramsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API