Legal Opinion
Glanden v. Quirk
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided December 7, 2015No. 145, 2015PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SEITZ, Justice:
I. INTRODUCTION
Husband .appeals from a Family Court order dividing marital property and granting alimony to Wife following their divorce after twenty-two years of marriage. The court divided the non-retirement assets 65% in Wife’s favor, and divided the remaining marital property equally. The court awarded alimony for an indefinite period.
Husband contends the trial judge erred by including in the marital estate part of a January 2013 payment from his law firm received after the couple separated. Husband also claims that the court abused its discretion by dividing the couple’s…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Lorillard Tobacco Co. v. American Legacy FoundationSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Scion Breckenridge Managing Member, LLC v. ASB Allegiance Real Estate FundSupreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- DCV Holdings, Inc. v. ConAgra, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2005
- Gatz Properties, LLC v. Auriga Capital Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2012
- Forrester v. ForresterSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Lankford v. LankfordSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Grant v. GrantSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- King v. HowardSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- Allen v. HartSupreme Court of Delaware · 2024
- Fielder v. FielderSupreme Court of Delaware · 2020
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.