Legal Opinion

Columbia Gas Transmission Corp. v. Exclusive Natural Gas Storage Easement

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided October 27, 1993No. 93-129PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The United States District Court, Northern District of Ohio, Eastern Division, pursuant to S.Ct.Prac.R. XVI, has certified the following question to us:

“According to the law of the state of Ohio, what is the measure of just compensation for the appropriation of an underground gas storage easement?”

We hold that the proper manner to determine the value of an underground gas storage easement was delineated by United States District Court Judge Dowd, Jr., when he instructed the commission which he had appointed under Fed. R.Civ.P. 71A(h). Judge Dowd’s analysis is as follows:

“In determining just…

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Chance v. BP Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Commonwealth v. JungMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
  3. City of Cincinnati v. BanksOhio Court of Appeals · 2001
  4. State v. Mitchell, 88977 (11-21-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  5. Chance v. BP Chemicals, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API