Legal Opinion

United States v. Gray

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided December 16, 1982No. 82 C 2556PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PRENTICE H. MARSHALL, District Judge.

This is an action on a promissory note executed by the defendant, Robert M. Gray (“Gray”), and assigned by the Union National Bank arid Trust Co. of Joliet, Illinois, the original payee, to the United States in 1978. Gray had given the bank the note in exchange for a home improvement loan which was guaranteed by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development (“HUD”) pursuant to 12 U.S.C. §§ 1703(a) & 1703(c)(1) (Supp. V 1981). Under the provisions of that statute, HUD guarantees payment of the loan, and if the borrower…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Sterling-Midland Coal Co. v. Great Lakes Coal & Coke Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Community Bank v. EllOregon Supreme Court · 1977
  3. United Overseas Bank v. Veneers, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1974
  4. Bank of Wyandotte v. WoodrowDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 1975
  5. United States v. DobrowolskiDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1954

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bank of Chicago-Garfield Ridge v. Park National BankAppellate Court of Illinois · 1992
  2. Rogolofoi v. GuerreroSupreme Court of The Commonwealth of The Northern Mariana Islands · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API