Legal Opinion

St. Vincent Medical Group v. Ford Baldwin, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 26, 2023PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Cite as

2023 Ark. 151

SUPREME COURT OF ARKANSAS No. CV-23-42 Opinion Delivered: October 26, 2023 ST. VINCENT MEDICAL GROUP APPELLANT APPEAL FROM THE PULASKI COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT V. [NO. 60CV-20-5603] FORD BALDWIN, ON BEHALF OF HONORABLE MORGAN E. HIMSELF AND ALL OTHERS WELCH, JUDGE SIMILARLY SITUATED APPELLEES REVERSED AND REMANDED. RHONDA K. WOOD, Associate Justice In this class-action lawsuit, Ford Baldwin alleged that St. Vincent Medical Group violated the Patient Right-to-Know Act,

Ark. Code Ann. §§ 20-6-201

et seq. Baldwin claims that St. Vincent, after terminating his primary-care…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Sanofi Winthrop Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2001
  2. Arthur v. ZearleySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Philip Morris Cos. Inc. v. MinerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2015
  4. Baker v. Wyeth-Ayerst Laboratories DivisionSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
  5. DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. SmelserSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Becky Lewallen, in Her Official Capacity as Washington County Clerk v. Progress for Cane Hill, a Local-Option Ballot Question CommitteeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API