United States v. Karl Touset
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge:
This appeal presents the question whether the Fourth Amendment requires reasonable suspicion for a forensic search of an electronic device at the border. U.S. Const. amend. IV. Karl Touset appeals the denial of his motions to suppress the child pornography found on electronic devices that he carried with him when he entered the country and the fruit of later searches. We recently held that the Fourth Amendment does not require a warrant or probable cause for a forensic search of a cell phone at the border. United States v. Vergara , 884 F.3d 1309 (11th Cir. 2018).…
Also in this document: Concurring in the judgment.
2Cases cited40 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Boyd v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- New York v. FerberSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- United States v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- United States v. Miguel CanoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Donald WanjikuCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Paul Johnson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Raymond AigbekaenCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2019
- United States v. Jordan Jysae PulidoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2025
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.