Legal Opinion
Meade v. Meade
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided January 17, 1924No. 6 Div. 963PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtThomas, J.
The suit by the wife (appellant) against the mother-in-law was for damages for alleged alienation of the affections of appellant's husband. This class of suit is not new in this jurisdiction. Parker v. Newman, 200 Ala. 103, 75 South. 479; Coker v. Coker, 209 Ala. 295, 96 South. 201; Woodson v. Bailey, post, p. 568, 98 South. 809.
The complaint contained two counts. Demurrers having been overruled, a plea of the general issue in short by consent was interposed. No question for review is presented by the record proper.
The judgment for defendant on the verdict of the jury was duly entered on…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Lewis v. MartinSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
- Fries v. Acme White Lead & Color WorksSupreme Court of Alabama · 1918
- Parker v. NewmanSupreme Court of Alabama · 1917
- Liverpool London Globe Ins. Co. v. LoweSupreme Court of Alabama · 1922
- Woodson v. BaileySupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Luther v. LutherSupreme Court of Alabama · 1924
- Ray v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1925