Legal Opinion
United States v. Brundidge
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided April 2, 1999No. 98-2200PublishedCited by 61 opinions
1Per curiam
Chancey Brundidge (“Brundidge”) appeals the district court’s denial of his motion to suppress evidence. He also appeals his sentence. We see no reversible error, so we affirm.
Background
A confidential informant (“Cl”), with a companion, went to a motel room where they met Brundidge, also known as “Smoke.” Based on this meeting, the Cl contacted Investigator Frank Forte (“Forte”). Forte drove the Cl to the motel, and the Cl point ed out Brundidge’s room. The Cl also described Brundidge’s car. Forte left the motel to get a search warrant, after calling a surveillance unit to the scene.
The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- United States v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- United States v. Francis Everett Foree and Christina DrazninCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. AndertonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by61 opinions
- Mizzaro v. Home Depot, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2008
- United States v. BradleyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- United States v. KapordelisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2009
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2006
- United States v. Bradley Joseph SteigerCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2003
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.