Legal Opinion
Mizzaro v. Home Depot, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided October 8, 2008No. 07-13810, 07-13811, 07-13812, 07-13813 and 07-13859PublishedCited by 214 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MARCUS, Circuit Judge:
To survive a motion to dismiss under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, the factual allegations contained in a private securities fraud class action complaint must raise a “strong inference,” one that is “cogent and compelling,” that the named defendants acted with the requisite scienter. The question presented in this appeal is whether lead plaintiff Bucks County Retirement Board’s (“Bucks County’s”) Amended Class Action Complaint (“ACAC” or “amended complaint”) against Home Depot, Inc. and six of its officers and directors has met this demanding…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by214 opinions
- Roman Zak v. Chelsea Therapeutics InternationalCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015
- FindWhat Investor Group v. FindWhat. ComCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Institutional Investors Group v. Avaya, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2009
- Axa Equitable Life Insurance v. Infinity Financial Group, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 2009
- Thompson v. Relationserve Media, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
209 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.