Legal Opinion

Stroemer v. Shevin

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided January 29, 1973No. 72-1627-Civ-WMPublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MEHRTENS, District Judge.

This cause came before the • Court upon Plaintiff’s Motion for a partial summary judgment. Plaintiff’s claim for damages have by stipulation of the parties been stricken and all issues of material fact have been resolved. The Court, pursuant to Rule 56, Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, finds that there remain no other issues of material fact.

This is an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and the Court invoked jurisdiction of this cause pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3). The instant Complaint does not present a substantial federal constitutional question…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Claudine Hall, Individually and on Behalf of All Persons Similarly Situated v. Sylvia GarsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
  3. Barber v. RaderDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1972
  4. Commercial Metals Company v. International Union Marine CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Callen v. Sherman's, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
  2. USA I Lehndorff Vermoegensverwaltung GmbH & Cie v. Cousins Club, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Johnson v. Riverside Hotel, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API