Legal Opinion

State v. Russell

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 2, 1914No. 24,281PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

This is an application by appellants to be admitted to bail after a conviction in the district court upon a criminal charge and a refusal by that court to stay execution of the judgment of conviction and its refusal to admit appellants to bail.

*291The application is accompanied by tbe affidavit of counsel who did not take part in the trial. His affidavit is to tbe effect that be is informed and believes that tbe record will show that tbe evidence was insufficient to sustain tbe verdict. A further claim, supported only by tbe affidavit referred to, is that tbe instructions to tbe jury were…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. PettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
  2. State Ex Rel. Mastrian v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
  3. State v. FreitagSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  4. State v. WilsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API