Legal Opinion

Chicago & St. Louis Railroad v. Ashling

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 16, 1889PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of La Salle County; the Hon. Doranoe Díbell, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtC. B. Smith, J.

This was an action on the case brought by appellee as administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, Edward W. Ashling, against appellant, to recover damages on account of the death of her husband caused by the alleged negligence of appellant. The declaration is not abstracted, but as no question is made as to its sufficiency, and no question arises under it, we assume that it is in the usual form, charging that the death of Edward W. Ashling was caused by the negligence of appellant, and that the deceased was in the exercise of due care. • •

From the evidence, we learn that the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ColemanIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
  2. Michigan Central Railroad v. GougarIllinois Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. LeeIllinois Supreme Court · 1871
  4. Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. SykesIllinois Supreme Court · 1880
  5. North Chicago Rolling Mill Co. v. MorrisseyIllinois Supreme Court · 1884

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Delaware & Hudson Canal Co. v. MitchellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  2. Hoke v. Harrisburg Hospital, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1935
  3. Mogk v. Chicago City Ry. Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API