Legal Opinion

W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Hannon

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided February 24, 1944No. 5 Div. 392PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARDNER, Chief Justice.

Plaintiff, The W. T. Rawleigh Company, a manufacturer of medicines, toilet articles, and the like, sued to recover of the defendants, as guarantors, money due it by T. S. McCain, who had with the plaintiff a contract to purchase its articles on a credit basis. Contracts of a similar nature have often been before the courts. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. Deavours, 209 Ala. 127, 95 So. 459; W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Wilson, 7 Ala.App. 242, 60 So. 1001; W. T. Rawleigh Medical Co. v. Walker, 16 Ala.App. 232, 77 So. 70. In view of its similarity to the other contracts so often…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Capital Security Co. v. OwenSupreme Court of Alabama · 1916
  2. Corinth Bank & Trust Co. v. CochranSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Womack v. BirdSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
  4. W. T. Rawleigh Co. v. DeavoursSupreme Court of Alabama · 1923
  5. Chichester v. First Nat. Bank of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1941

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gray v. Great American Reserve Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Resolute Fire Ins. Co. v. O'RearAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949
  3. Resolute Fire Ins. Co. v. O'RearAlabama Court of Appeals · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API