Corkran & Meloney v. Taylor

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.

The appellant, defendant below, employed the plaintiffs to give his automobile a general overhauling, and disputed their bill on the ground of defective work. Plaintiffs having sued in the District Court to recover the amount of their bill, $204, defendant filed a small set-off, which was allowed at the trial, and also a notice of recoupment of damages for alleged defective work, amounting to $710.49, which was properly struck out as exceeding the jurisdiction of the *196court. Kienzle v. Gardner, 44 Vroom 258. There was a verdict and judgment…