Legal Opinion
Hanania v. City of Tucson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided April 19, 1979No. 2 CA-CIV 3127PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOWARD, Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the trial court authorizing the maintenance of a class action under Rule 23,16 A.R.C.P. The court also granted appellee’s motion for summary judgment, in her individual capacity, on the issue of liability. 1
The appellee, Hanania, sued the City of Tucson claiming that a fee of $1.00 per page charged by the Tucson Police Department for accident reports was excessive and unlawful. This case has not yet been tried on its merits.
In seeking review of the trial court’s order as to the class action, appellants rely on Home Federal Savings & Loan…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eisen v. Carlisle & JacquelinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Samuel Parkinson, as Custodian for Andrew Parkinson v. April Industries, Inc., and Alex M. ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1975
- Harry L. Hellerstein v. Mr. Steak, Inc., James A. MatherCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Eaton v. Unified School District No. 1Arizona Supreme Court · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BejaranoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
- Drew v. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Smith v. TobinSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.