Legal Opinion

Tamarkin v. Wells (In Re Wells)

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided July 27, 1988No. 19-11735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.

Defendant Joanne Wells (“defendant”) has filed this motion to vacate an August 12, 1987 order which declared nondis-chargeable a debt owed by defendant to plaintiff Michael J. Tamarkin (“plaintiff”). The order was entered after defendant failed to file an answer within an ambiguous extended answer period. We find that defendant’s failure to answer constituted excusable neglect, that plaintiff will not be substantially prejudiced if the judgment is opened and that defendant has a potentially meritorious defense. Accordingly, we grant the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hritz v. Woma Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1984
  2. Aida Feliciano v. Reliant Tooling Company, Ltd. And Union Special Corporation, Sun Alliance and London Insurance, LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
  3. Louis H. GROSS, Lillian C. Gross and Marvin Kowit, Co-Partners, Trading as Gross & Kowit v. STEREO COMPONENT SYSTEMS, INC., AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
  4. Robert Lepkowski v. United States Department of the TreasuryCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Clara Zawadski De Bueno v. Alejandro Bueno Castro and A.B.P. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In Re Tuan Tan DinhUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Aponte v. Aungst (In Re Aponte)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. In Re Tygart Industries, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API