Legal Opinion
Aponte v. Aungst (In Re Aponte)
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 23, 1988No. 15-16406PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Bankruptcy Judge.
Twenty eight (28) days after we entered an order against defendant Walter Aungst, Jr. (“defendant”) based on his violations of 11 U.S.C. § 362, defendant filed a motion for leave to extend the appeal period. Plaintiff Miguel V. Aponte (“plaintiff”) has filed an objection, alleging that defendant has not shown the excusable neglect required by N.B.R. 8002(c). We agree with plaintiff and deny defendant’s motion.
Rule 8002(c) creates a two-tiered system for evaluating motions for leave to appeal. If the motion is filed within the appeal…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Clara Zawadski De Bueno v. Alejandro Bueno Castro and A.B.P. CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- In re Universal Minerals Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Consolidated Freightways Corporation Of Delaware v. LarsonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Reinsurance Company of America, Inc. v. Administratia Asigurarilor De Stat (Administration of State Insurance)Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
- Robert L. Campbell, Cross-Appellee v. W.R. Bowlin, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lang v. LangCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2005
- Lang v. Lang (In Re Lang)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Tenth Circuit · 2004
- Huennekens v. Marx (In Re Springfield Contracting Corp.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia · 1993
- Myron Jacobson Virginia Jacobson v. Jess Nielsen Ricard BirchCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- Auto Specialties Manufacturing Co. v. Sachs (In Re Auto Specialties Manufacturing Co.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Michigan · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.