Legal Opinion
Carson v. Carson
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 24, 1933No. 21385PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtRiley, C. J.
The defendant in error, Ethel Carson, commenced this action against the New York Life Insurance Company and Nina L. Carson, plaintiff in error. The action against the New York Life Insurance Company is for recovery upon an ordinary old line life insurance policy for the sum of $2,-000, issued by the company upon the life of Clark C. Carson, the then husband of the plaintiff. The policy was dated June 21,1927. The beneficiary therein was named as “Ethel H., wife of the insured (with right on the part of the insured to change the beneficiary in the .manner herein provided).” As against the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Freund v. FreundIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Keener v. Grand LodgeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1889
- McLaughlin v. McLaughlinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Wendt v. Iowa Legion of HonorSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Berg v. DamkoehlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1902
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Harjo v. FoxSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- O'Neal v. O'NealSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Carl W. Dalton, Jr. v. Cornel LeblancCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1965
- New York Life Insurance v. WilsonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
- American Nat. Ins. v. ReidDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1952
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.