Legal Opinion
Kempf v. Magida
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 9, 2014PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for legal malpractice, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Adams, J.), dated October 4, 2012, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he failed to present evidence in admissible form establishing that the plaintiffs were unable to prove at least one of the essential elements of a cause of action to recover damages for legal malpractice (see Barnave v Davis, 108 AD3d 582 [2013]; Valley Ventures, LLC v Joseph J.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rudolf v. Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & SauerNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
- Alizio v. FeldmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Valley Ventures, LLC v. HaspelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Barnave v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
3Cited by11 opinions
- Quantum Corporate Funding, Ltd. v. EllisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Burbige v. Siben & FerberAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Rojas v. PaineAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Atiencia v. PinczewskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- Bivona v. Danna & Associates, P.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.