Legal Opinion

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. The Erection Company, Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 27, 1990No. 89-35131PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

This appeal challenges the sealing of a consent decree. Because the district court failed to articulate any basis for the sealing of the decree, we REVERSE and REMAND with instructions to the court to articulate its reasoning and findings.

FACTS

In May, 1986, appellant, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), filed an employment discrimination action against appellee Erection Company under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. The EEOC alleged that the employer had misused name request referral procedures in its collective bargaining agreement…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982
  3. Valley Broadcasting Co. v. United States District CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Kamakana v. City and County of HonoluluCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  2. Does I thru XXIII v. Advanced Textile Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  3. Angela K. Hagestad v. Roger C. Tragesser v. Oregon State Bar, Intervenor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
  4. IDT Corp v. AR Public Law CenterCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  5. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Gary Van Waeyenberghe and Carl Leibowitz, and Howard K. SchwartzCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API