Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. Reeves (In Re Reeves)
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION
JOHN J. HARGROVE, Bankruptcy Judge.
Presently before the court is the motion of Farris D. Reeves (“debtor”) to dismiss the complaint to determine dischargeability of debt of Sears, Roebuck & Co. (“Sears”) pursuant to Bankruptcy Rule 7004 which incorporates Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(a) and 4(j). At issue is whether Sears has good cause to be excused from properly serving the summons and complaint within 120 days. Also at issue is whether Sears has shown good cause to be granted an extension of time to refile a complaint to determine dischargeability.
This court has…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Shihshu Walter Wei v. State of HawaiiCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Linn & Lane Timber Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Townsel v. County Of Contra CostaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Gregory Whale v. United States of America, United States Drug Enforcement Agency, Federal Bureau of InvestigationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- United States ex rel. DeLoss v. Kenner General Contractors Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Cartage Pacific, Inc. v. Waldner (In Re Waldner)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Dederick & Himlie, P.A. v. DuFour (In Re DuFour)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- DuVoisin v. Arrington (In Re Southern Industrial Banking Corp.)District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1996
- In Re SmithUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 1998
- Ingala v. Sciarretto (In Re Sciarretto)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.