Legal Opinion

Allan v. Rochester Institute of Technology

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 16, 1994PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly granted partial summary judgment to plaintiffs on the issue of defendants’ liability pursuant to Labor Law § 240 (1). William Allan, Jr. (plaintiff), an ironworker, fell approximately 30 feet when a beam upon which he was sitting became detached at one end and fell, throwing him to the ground. Plaintiff asserted that no safety devices were provided by defendants. Third-party defendants contend that a factual issue exists whether plaintiff was a recalcitrant worker.

We conclude that the evidence provided by third-party…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Stolt v. General Foods Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Hagins v. StateNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  3. Murray v. Niagara Frontier Transportation AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. Laurie v. Niagara Candy, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kanney v. Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  2. Milewski v. CaiolaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997
  3. Elkins v. Robbins & Cowan, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API