Legal Opinion
Zoppi v. Traurig
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided October 5, 1990PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
251 N.J. Super. 283 (1990)
598 A.2d 19
JOSEPH ZOPPI AND ADELINE ZOPPI, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
IRWIN TRAURIG AND BEATRICE MUSKAT AND YEE FO ENG AND YOON YAM ENG, HIS WIFE, DEFENDANTS. YEE FO ENG AND YOON YAM ENG, HIS WIFE, PLAINTIFFS,
v.
IRWIN TRAURIG, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division Essex County.
Decided October 5, 1990.
Susan Bielanowski for Joseph Zoppi and Adeline Zoppi (Gannon & Schwartz, attorneys).
Allan Maitlin for Yee Fo Eng and Yoon Yam Eng (Feuerstein, Sachs, Maitlin & Fleming, attorneys).
Richard D. Bennett for Irwin Traurig and Beatrice Muskat (Bennett & Bennett, attorneys).
OPIN…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Culver v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
- Jannarone v. WT Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
- Kelleher v. LozziSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Culver v. Ins. Co. of North Amer.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1987
- Foster Estates, Inc. v. WolekNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Union Mutual Fire Insurance v. JoergSupreme Court of Vermont · 2003
- Ram Mutual Insurance Co. v. RohdeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
- Rausch v. Allstate InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Neubauer v. HostetterSupreme Court of Iowa · 1992
- Tri-Par Investments, L.L.C. v. SousaNebraska Supreme Court · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.