Legal Opinion

Chemical Bank v. Belk

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1979No. 7826SC580PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN (Robert M.), Judge.

We note at the outset that, according to an addendum to the record filed by the parties, the property in question has been sold by mutual consent of the parties, mooting any discussion of foreclosure on these facts. We also have noted the opinion of our Supreme Court in Ross Realty Co. v. Trust Co., 296 N.C. 366, 250 S.E. 2d 271 (1979), reversing the ruling of this Court in the same case at 37 N.C. App. 33, 245 S.E. 2d 404 (1978). Under Ross Realty, it is clear that where a mortgage or deed of trust is executed by a vendee to secure to the vendor the balance of the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Ross Realty Co. v. First Citizens Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  2. Board of Managers of the James Walker Memorial Hospital v. City of WilmingtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  3. Bullington v. . AngelSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  4. Bunn v. BraswellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Motyka v. NappierCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Barnaby v. BoardmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1985
  2. Brunsoman v. ScarlettNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. In Re Foreclosure of Sutton Investments, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
  4. LaSalle Bank National Ass'n v. SleutelCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2002
  5. Smith v. ChildsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API