Legal Opinion

State v. Blake

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 1971No. C-60390PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.

Defendant was convicted of assault and robbery while being armed with a dangerous weapon and rape. On appeal he contends that the trial court erred in: (1) denying the motion for a new trial because the jury verdict was not unanimous; (2) refusing to allow the alibi testimony of a witness not listed in his notice of alibi; and (3) modifying the judgment order outside of defendant’s presence.

Defendant’s first contention is that the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a unanimous jury verdict in all cases. This has been decided contrary to defendant’s contention in State v. Gann, 254 Or…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
  3. State v. WardiusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
  4. Long v. MintoOregon Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  2. State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
  3. Ramahi v. Hobart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. KlimentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API