State v. Blake
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
Defendant was convicted of assault and robbery while being armed with a dangerous weapon and rape. On appeal he contends that the trial court erred in: (1) denying the motion for a new trial because the jury verdict was not unanimous; (2) refusing to allow the alibi testimony of a witness not listed in his notice of alibi; and (3) modifying the judgment order outside of defendant’s presence.
Defendant’s first contention is that the Sixth Amendment guarantees the right to a unanimous jury verdict in all cases. This has been decided contrary to defendant’s contention in State v. Gann, 254 Or…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. GannOregon Supreme Court · 1969
- Daugharty v. GladdenOregon Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. WardiusCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1971
- Long v. MintoOregon Supreme Court · 1916
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. DeCampCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- State v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2006
- Ramahi v. Hobart Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- State v. RickardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. KlimentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.