Legal Opinion
Marcus v. Masucci
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided October 31, 2000No. 00 Civ. 3519(RWS)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SWEET, District Judge.
Defendants Samuel Masucci (“Masucci”) and Bear Stearns & Co., Inc. (“Bear Stearns”) (collectively, the “Defendants”) have moved to compel plaintiff Steven Marcus (“Marcus”) to arbitrate this dispute and dismissing or, alternatively, staying this action pending arbitration pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and the Federal Arbitration Act (“FAA”), 9 U.S.C. § 1 et seq., and the By-laws of the National Association of Securities Dealers Inc. (“NASD”). For the reasons set forth below, the motion will be granted, arbitration is compelled,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- At&T Technologies, Inc. v. Communications WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Gilmer v. Interstate/Johnson Lane Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Ryan, Beck & Co., LLC. v. FakihDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2003
- Valentine Capital Asset Management, Inc. v. AgahiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Freund v. UBS Financial Services, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2015
- Smith v. Professional Security BureauDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002